Glen Canyon and the Colorado River
Skip Navigation LinksHome>>Pharmaceuticals in Water

Pharmaceuticals Found in Water Supplies!

Presciption pills

Reporters from the Associated Press’ National Investigative Team reviewed hundreds of scientific reports, federal databases and environmental studies and interviewed more than 230 officials, academics and scientists and private water suppliers in all 50 states.
Following this exhaustive project, it was concluded that a disturbing array of pharmaceuticals have been found in water supplies.

Following is a partial list of what the Investigative Team uncovered:

  • Philadelphia: 56 pharmaceuticals or byproducts in treated drinking water, including medicines for pain, infection, high cholesterol, asthma, epilepsy, mental illness and heart problems. Sixty-three pharmaceuticals or byproducts were found in the city’s watersheds.
  • Southern California: Anti-epileptic and anti-anxiety medications were detected in a portion of the treated drinking water for 18.5 million people.
  • Northern New Jersey: Drinking water treatment plant, which serves 850,000 people, found a metabolized angina medicine and the mood-stabilizing carbamazepine in drinking water.
  • San Francisco: A sex hormone was detected in drinking water.
  • Washington D.C.: The drinking water for Washington, D.C., and surrounding areas tested positive for six pharmaceuticals.
  • Tucson AZ: Three medications, including an antibiotic, were found in drinking water supplied to the municipality of Tucson.

There is NOT a Federal Government mandate for municipalities and well owners to test for pharmaceuticals in water, or have the Agencies set any maximum contaminant levels. As a matter of fact, the common water quality tests available through certified water quality labs would not even detect these levels of pharmaceutical contaminants.
NSF the gold standard private water quality certifying organization in the USA, has not established a standard for the testing of these contaminates. Of the 62 major water providers contacted by the Investigative Team, the drinking water for only 28 was tested. Among the 34 that haven’t: Houston, Chicago, Miami, Baltimore, Phoenix, Boston and New York City’s Department of Environmental Protection, which delivers water to 9 million people.

Health Risks:

Researchers do not yet understand the exact risks associated with persistent exposure to random combinations of low levels of pharmaceuticals, however, some studies uncovered dangerous effects on humans and animals.

Pharmaceutical cartoon

To nobody’s surprise, the Pharmaceutical Industry had initially gone on record to state that: "Based on what we now know, I would say we find there’s little or no risk from pharmaceuticals in the environment to human health," said microbiologist Thomas White, a consultant for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

But at a conference last summer, Mary Buzby — Director of Environmental Technology for drug maker Merck & Co. Inc. — said: "There’s no doubt about it, pharmaceuticals are being detected in the environment and there is genuine concern that these compounds, in the small concentrations that they’re at, could be causing impacts to human health or to aquatic organisms."

The reaction from the Federal Government is: "We recognize it is a growing concern and we’re taking it very seriously," said Benjamin H. Grumbles, assistant administrator for water at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Removal of contaminants:

Some time will be needed to determine the optimal solution for removal of pharmaceuticals in drinking water due to the need for extensive testing. However, as with removal of other contaminants in water, the more effective means of treatment that are installed and utilized the cleaner the water will become.
More on water qualities...

Initial studies indicate that some reduction in pharmaceuticals is achieved from Granular Activated Carbon. GAC has been used for decades in water treatment to adsorb many dangerous compounds and undisirable oders. Jupiter Science Ionizers employ the the all new USA made Biostone Plus filtration system which utilize GAC as the primary filtration media and is specifically engineered to put an effective spin on the water to increase effectiveness.  Now it has been improved upon!

Reverse Osmosis (R/O) treatment was specifically designed to provide a way to remove up to 98% of all dissolved and suspended materials in water. The disadvantage of R/O is the fact that water produced is virtually mineral free and typically highly acidic on the pH scale. Both of those properties in R/O water are not natural for the body. IonMicrowater has  a new system that incorporates R/O and re-mineralization before the ionizer. Some well water and other water with known contaminants it would be an obvious choice to install an efficient RO system and then use a water ionizer downstream to improve water qualities.

Some consumers may see Bottled Water as an alternative, but bottled water in many cases comes from sources that are contaminated, and is typically treated with R/O. Bottled water also has disadvantages due to leaching of plastic residue into the water inside and environmental damage created by manufacturing and disposal of the plastic bottle itself. Then there are other issues...

In fact, the Biostone Plus Water Ionizer filter in our products and the ionization process itself provides increased treatment solutions. The process separates acidic from alkaline ions, which will eliminate some contaminants from your drinking water. For example fluoride is an acidic mineral. Please read more about the effectiveness of the all new Biostone Plus ionizer filter with vortices hydraulics.

Of course as developments occur, we will continue to update information!